Welcome to jctrans.net , Join Free |  Sign In
GMT+8 TUESDAY  13:40 2013/01/29 中文站
Exhibitions

Executive Talks

1of5

Interview with Milad M Istefanous, Executive Director of Philomina Global Services Co. Ltd.

Interview with Milad M Istefanous, Executive Director of Philomina Global Services Co. Ltd.

Philomina Global Head office located at Khartoum City that is well known, and having branches @ Port Sudan (Seaport City), and our modern office systems and all staff to give excellent services to our potential customers and worldwide associates.

Interview with Filipe Garcia, Branch Manager of Inicio transitarios Lda

Interview with Filipe Garcia, Branch Manager of Inicio transitarios Lda

Since the year 2000 INÍCIO TRANSITÁRIOS has been dedicated with total commitment to the creation of door-to-door transport solutions, regarding maritime and air logistics, on an international basis.

Interview with Ken Zhu,of Coeffort (Shanghai) Logistics & SCM Co., Ltd

Interview with Ken Zhu,of Coeffort (Shanghai) Logistics & SCM Co., Ltd

Coeffort was established in January 2015, core business of Coeffort is supply chain management and provide professional solutions, including supply chain financing, supply chain design, procurement and distribution, international customs clearance agent, executive stock trusteeship, Department of outsourcing, outsourcing processing and distribution management, supply chain services. I hope our business can do for customers "time Save", "money Save", "way touching One".

Interview with Arturo Chavez, Commercial Manager  of Smart Logistics Group

Interview with Arturo Chavez, Commercial Manager of Smart Logistics Group

SMART LOGISTICS GROUP is a premier transportation and logistics company, with coverage in SPAIN/EUROPE. Our value-added services portfolio includes import and export freight management, truck brokerage, intermodal, load/mode and network optimization, and global visibility. We provide freight forwarding, customs brokerage, warehousing and all other logistics services.

Interview with Ordan Cargo, Managing Director of Ordan Cargo Ltd

Interview with Ordan Cargo, Managing Director of Ordan Cargo Ltd

We are " ORDAN CARGO LTD" a freight forwarding & logistics company based in Tel Aviv, Israel since 2001 having presences at all main ports ASHDOD/HAIFA/TLV for Import/Export/Cross SEA/AIR. We provide excellent and creative logistics solutions as well as quality service with competitive prices.

US solar duty violated trade rules, WTO finds

Source:pv-magazine    2014-7-16 9:32:00

The commitment made by the U.S. to abide by the World Trade Organization's (WTO) global trade rules was violated by 2012's decision to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese solar panels, the WTO ruled Monday.

A WTO panel judged the U.S.'s actions rule-breaking and that it amounted to illegal protection of its own solar producers, refusing to accept Washington's evidence that state-owned or partially state-owned enterprises in China accused of passing on the subsidies were, in fact, "public bodies."

Trade diplomats working on the $7.2 billion Chinese case have instead called on the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) to adapt its measures to bring them in line with the WTO agreements to which the nation is bound.

In response to the ruling, China's Ministry of Commerce issued the following statement: "China urges the U.S. to respect the WTO rulings and correct its wrongdoings of abusively using trade remedy measures, and to ensure an environment of fair competition for Chinese enterprises."

The initial trade case, launched in 2012 and led by SolarWorld, was in response in the U.S. to alleged state-support offered by the Chinese government to its solar companies that allowed them to drastically undercut their global rivals on cost.

However, while the WTO ruled in favor of the Chinese, some aspects of China's complaint were thrown out by the WTO - offering a crumb of comfort for U.S. trade representative Michael Froman. "With respect to the other findings in the panel report, the Administration is carefully evaluating its options, and will take all appropriate steps to ensure that U.S. remedies against unfair subsidies remain strong and effective," he said.

Solar industry responds
The ruling prompted two of the largest solar organizations in the U.S. into immediate response. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) - the national trade association of the U.S. solar industry - was notably cautious, issuing the following carefully worded statement: "We are continuing to follow developments closely, but the WTO's decision is not expected to impact either the 2012 U.S. solar countervailing duty (CVD) order against China, or any new CVD tied to the ongoing investigation until 2016, at the the earliest.

"It is also important to remember that this decision is subject to an appeals process, which could take approximately 120 days. Assuming the decision is upheld on appeal, the U.S. would then have approximately one year to implement the decision. But even then, it is not clear whether the decision will result in any substantive modification of a solar CVD order against China."

Jigar Shar, president of the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy (CASE), was more vitriolic, stating: "CASE agrees with the WTO that some important parts of the protectionist 2012 U.S. solar tariff are inconsistent with our trade commitments to others. Even more importantly, they hurt American solar workers and slow the deployment of clean energy," said Shah, who reserved particular opprobrium for the DOC.

"Yet the American solar industry once again faces uncertainty and unnecessary price hikes due to a new round of legal actions at the DOC. June's countervailing duty determination is increasing module prices by 14%, and the DOC may attempt to further hike rates and expand solar tariffs with a preliminary anti dumping determination next week."

Shah added that this ruling by the WTO should prompt the Obama administration to reconsider the wisdom of additional solar tariffs, urging the president to "bridge the divide" between all parties concerned.

This ruling from the WTO is unrelated to the ongoing U.S. trade complaint against India, where stringent domestic content requirements in the country's solar sector have also drawn criticism from the U.S.